Digital Déjà Vu – FTX and Refco

It is a bit more of a challenge to find a historical analogy for the very recent FTX collapse. MF Global is not a bad comparison, with risky bets and a shortfall of customer funds.

Stay informed

Catch Zodia Markets in the latest news.

Share

It is a bit more of a challenge to find a historical analogy for the very recent FTX collapse. MF Global is not a bad comparison, with risky bets and a shortfall of customer funds.

The FTT token is another curiosity. Among other things, it allowed holders to access discounts on trading fees and OTC rebates. Its issuance has some similarities to a debt versus equity structure, which was a common contributing factor in the failure of several banks in the 2008 Financial Crisis.

A better example though, is the collapse of Refco in 2005, which showcased weaknesses in basic corporate governance controls as well as a failure to segregate client assets.

Refco was a New York-based financial services company that was mainly focused on commodities broking. It boasted over $75bn in assets, thousands of customer accounts and was the largest broker on the CME. In August 2005 it had an IPO that, somewhat ironically, had a sale price of $22 a share. This was the same price that Alameda offered to Binance for its FTT tokens.

In October 2005 the CEO, Phil Bennett, announced he was taking a leave of absence after he had been found to be in control of an entity that owed Refco $430m. He had been using this unregulated offshore entity, which was based in Bermuda (FTX is based in the Bahamas, so the similarity is not far off), to conceal millions in bad debts, The cause of the losses was immediately unclear, although leaks since the bankruptcy have pointed to losses by large clients as well as an offshore entity with $525m in fake bonds. What was clear was that at the end of each quarter the CEO had arranged for Refco to lend to a hedge fund called Liberty Corner Capital Strategy, which in turn lent to the Bermudan company Bennett controlled, Refco Group Holdings, which then paid the money back to Refco.

According to Reuters articles, a similar move took place between FTX and Alameda. In May and June Alameda suffered losses, so Sam Bankman-Fried sought to prop them up with a $4bn transfer of FTX funds secured by assets including FTT and shares in Robinhood. He did not tell FTX executives about the move, as was the case with Bennett.

In the bankruptcy proceedings, Refco’s large creditors managed to convince the court that its customers were unsecured creditors because of Refco’s failure to segregate the customer accounts from their general funds. This left Refco’s thousands of trading account customers with roughly 30 cents on the dollar. Reports indicate that FTX’s customer funds were similarly not segregated.

Refco made it into the top 20 bankruptcies in US history by size and Bennett was imprisoned for eight years. He was released from prison on health grounds in 2020 at the age of 71. The FTX story has some way to go.

Related articles

  • Digital Déjà Vu – Voyager Digital and Knickerbocker Trust

    Digital Deja Vu Voyager Digital and Knickerbocker Trust 1

    This story covers three topics. First, as markets evolve, they often see a wave of new entrants who are subject to lower regulatory requirements than the incumbents, sometimes known as ‘regulatory arbitrage’.

    Read more: Digital Déjà Vu – Voyager Digital and Knickerbocker Trust
  • Digital Déjà Vu – ICOs and 17th Century Treasure Hunters

    Digital Deja Vu – ICOs and 17th Century Treasure Hunters 1

    Cryptoasset markets are often thought of as innovative, which is true in some cases, but not all. Slow processes and regulation can certainly be frustrating, but market participants should always be careful to not be blinded by neophilia, or a love of novelty.

    Read more: Digital Déjà Vu – ICOs and 17th Century Treasure Hunters
  • Responsibility and Sustainability in a Decentralised Environment: The ETH Merge

    Responsibility and Sustainability in a Decentralised Environment The ETH Merge 1

    The Ethereum merge, completed in September, transitioned the blockchain’s consensus mechanism from an energy-intensive proof-of-work (POW) to a proof-of-stake (POS) protocol. This has reduced energy consumption by more than 99.9%.1

    Read more: Responsibility and Sustainability in a Decentralised Environment: The ETH Merge
  • Zodia Markets signs Armed Forces Covenant

    Zodia Markets signs Armed Forces Covenant 1

    Zodia Markets is proud to announce its signing of the Armed Forces Covenant, demonstrating its commitment to treat fairly those who serve, or have served in the military, and their families, and emphasising the company’s dedication to fulfilling its social responsibilities.

    Read more: Zodia Markets signs Armed Forces Covenant

Latest

  • SEC likely to approve spot Ethereum ETFs on May 23: Standard Chartered Bank

    The Securities and Exchange Commission is expected to follow the strategy employed in approving spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds for spot Ethereum ETFs, starting with rejections and ultimately granting approval on the initial final deadline on May 23, according to Standard Chartered Bank.

  • On the chain

    Alex Pugh explores how blockchain is shaking up the post-trade process

  • Stablecoins: Roman Coins or Spanish Doubloons for the Modern Era

    Borderless by design, these modern digital tokens can make cross-border commerce much cheaper and easier.